Company Seal Name Differs From Proforma Invoice
A company seal that names a different entity from the proforma invoice should trigger a role and authority check.
Focused trade risk guides in this section. Use the list to move from the broad topic to the exact supplier, payment, shipment, or import document question.
A company seal that names a different entity from the proforma invoice should trigger a role and authority check.
Factory tour videos should be checked when signage, uniforms, or gate names differ from the seller's company record.
Distributor letters should be checked for issuer authority, product scope, expiry, and seller identity before buyers rely on them.
Platform profiles can support screening, but buyers should not treat them as a full company verification record.
Agent signatures need authority evidence before buyers accept contract terms, payment instructions, or claims responsibility.
A supplier refusing basic legal identity because the order is for export should trigger a verification pause.
Offshore or foreign-country beneficiaries should be mapped to the seller, group structure, and claim responsibility before wire transfer.
Catalog names should be compared with invoice, license, and website records before buyers rely on product capability claims.
Map pins should not replace registration, inspection, and supplier responsibility records for factory address checks.
OEM history claims should be treated as marketing until buyers can connect them to role, authorization, and product evidence.
Inspection reports that name another factory should be mapped to seller, site, invoice, and responsibility before payment.
Forwarder contacts should not become payment or invoice authority without written supplier authorization.
A supplier website without a legal entity footer should be treated as marketing until the buyer verifies the company behind it.
A contract-party change after deposit should be reviewed against payment proof, responsibility, and refund rights.
Certificate pages copied from another company should trigger holder, scope, and authorization checks before reliance.
A residential-looking contact address should be checked against registration, warehouse, factory, and invoice records.
Cropped or unclear seals should be corrected before buyers rely on signed contracts, authorization letters, or payment approvals.
Branch-office claims should be mapped to legal registration, sales authority, production role, and payment route.
Customer logos should not be treated as capability proof unless buyers can verify authorization, product relevance, and supplier role.
Repeated English trade names should be tied to a specific Chinese legal entity before buyers approve documents.